Learning About On-Line Communities :: Internet Technology Computer Chats Essays

Finding out About On-Line Communities Segment 1: What I Know, Assume or Imagine. What I know, or rather, what I accept I know, about on-line networks is incredibly constrained since I don't generally take an interest in these sorts of networks myself. I have essentially no involvement with the zone of on-line networks and have never really endeavored to join, or even peruse, through them. Everything that I contemplate this region of intrigue is essentially what I have gotten notification from my companions or family with respect to their encounters in different talk rooms and other on-line networks. What I accept I know is additionally founded mostly on the odds and ends of data that I accumulate sporadically from the media. At the point when certain insightful report programs air data that uncovers research from different sites, for example, the various kinds of sites that are accessible, and the sorts of individuals that may be found in certain talk rooms, I start to develop progressively inquisitive. Indeed, I once viewed an analytical report show that uncovered that it is so natural to set up your own site from your lounge room. The measure of individuals that chose to make their own sites for grouped reasons isn't as fascinating to me as the measure of individuals that are lured into signing on to these web sights. A few territories of intrigue even incorporate just viewing the designer of the site as they approach their day by day exercises in their lounge room. Some online groupies have even gotten so entranced with certain web locates that they appreciate watching the host of the webpage rest or utilize the restroom. I am certain that these sorts of networks are just a glimpse of something larger in the tremendous expanse of what is accessible to the extent on-line networks. What intrigues me most about the different sites and on-line networks accessible to general society is the way that such a significant number of individuals are devoured by these elective real factors and appear to appreciate experiencing a daily reality such that they can make their change inner selves. Many individuals appear to truly appreciate, or maybe even have a profound need, to make enhanced renditions of them. Individuals that frequently take part in this movement of making a liberal image of who they really are have a motivation behind drawing in others who the embellishers may feel would, something else, not be pulled in to enroll in discussion with them.

Use to Live Here Once. free essay sample

Use to live here once Introduction to English Literature, English 125 The subject of the story is about somebody who has passed on yet her soul is still here. I Dont believe that she understands she is dead as she takes a gander at various things from her home and what encompasses it. She despite everything sees the stones and names off the various types and she specifies the one stone that isn't protected and it is elusive. As she begins taking a gander at the deferent changes however I think she starts to acknowledges something is extraordinary; I don't know now yet however whether she realizes that he is dead or not.As she takes a gander at the sky she sees that It Is blue yet lustrous. She likewise saw the street and how It was more extensive and here however she referenced It despite everything has the equivalent incomplete look, Its Like here she imagines that she Is alive In my assessment. We will compose a custom exposition test on Use to Live Here Once. or on the other hand any comparative theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page As she draws nearer to the house she sees the house has been painted a white shading and she likewise observes something different abnormal; there Is a vehicle In the drive, which to her Its bizarre too. At this point I still dont think she understands she is dead however she may begin getting unusual vibes on the diverse changes.As she strolls on the stone strides toward the house she starts to get on edge since she sees the pine tree is gone as was the late spring house yet the clove tree was all the while standing. Out of nowhere she sees two kids out yonder, a kid and a young lady. From the start she makes proper acquaintance and she sees the kid and young lady didn't take a gander at her or even hear her. She goes to make proper acquaintance again and still know reaction. She strolls nearer to them and again makes proper acquaintance. The young lady despite everything doesn't see or hear her yet the kid does and looks straight Into her eyes.He at that point tells his sister It Is cold out gives up in, the young lady concurs. Now of the story she Just tosses her arms down to her side lastly understands this must be It. The subject of the story is about she goes to her old home and notification a portion of the things has changed and she attempts to speak with two of the kids that lives there and nobody RUNNING HEAD: Use to live here once Heres her however it seems the young man sees her. Why this is I have no clue since he Just tells his sister its cold outside and they ought to go in. (R. Wayne Glutton,I think what represents this story would need to be the young lady that comes 2010) back to her old home and acknowledges toward the end that she truly is dead and she is just an apparition. Passing is an image In this story and I additionally accept they referenced a pine tree which is a nature image and It implies everlasting status. The account topic again depends on somebody who has passed on however returns as a phantom and she sees that house was painted white which has changed, the old visitor house has been torn down, there is a vehicle now in the carport and there are two ell yet they don't see hear her.She at last goes up to them and the one in particular that appears to see her is the kid and he looks up at her and afterward tells the young lady it is cold around here and the young lady chooses to go in the house with him. It is somewhat impossible to miss that the kid had the option to see her, it Just makes one to believe was he phantom to. The young lady that has kicked the bucket acknowledges since this must be it and knows now she is an apparition.

Essay Topics on Gun Control - Have You Considered Other Options?

Essay Topics on Gun Control - Have You Considered Other Options?A lot of students, and even some professors, have trouble with essay topics on gun control. A variety of people do not feel strongly about gun ownership and may not understand why you think a certain type of weapon, or type of gun, is good for citizens. However, gun control is necessary, as there are too many people who feel that guns in the home, whether on or off the street, does not make a person safe.There have been some research studies done by scientists to show that guns in the home, whether loaded or unloaded, can be dangerous. For example, a study was done to find out how much energy a child holding a gun would have if it went off. They found that, if the gun was left inside the home, it would have about five pounds of energy. This is how dangerous it is when guns are there.When a parent says that he or she does not want a gun in the home, but then that gun gets used, the parent has to deal with that gun, and ho w it is in their possession, as well as how the parents and child react to it. It is a dangerous situation when children see a gun, or if the child feels that they are in danger when they see one. The same thing happens when adults use a gun, because they feel threatened, when in reality, it is not safe.In order to solve this problem, essay topics on gun control are needed. The aim is to make students realize the fact that this is a really serious topic that needs to be looked at seriously. Many of the solutions to this problem can be found at other countries where they do not allow guns.There are great methods that people can use to make sure that the weapons are stored safely, that are locked up, and that the guns are no longer there. It is important that when you take a topic like this, that you learn all the facts about the issue, and all the good methods to keep the situation under control.It can be hard to talk about this topic, but once the student is educated on the facts, a nd the good and bad things about guns, they will begin to look at guns differently. It is a great way to open up a discussion on gun control, and how it affects society as a whole.If a student wants to write their own essay topics on gun control, they may want to look at these other topics that a lot of people have written about. These other topics are great, because they have a very quick turnaround, so that the student can get their ideas into a body of writing that has a deadline.When a student tries to apply what they learn from the essay topics on gun control, they should be able to come up with some great results. They will have the ability to put together a proper paper, which will be acceptable in a class, or any type of writing.

Asylum - Immigration Glossary - Definition of Asylum

Refuge - Immigration Glossary - Definition of Asylum Refuge is the assurance conceded by a country to an individual who can't come back to their nation of origin because of a paranoid fear of arraignment. An asylee is an individual who looks for refuge. You may demand haven from the U.S. at the point when you show up at a U.S. port of passage, or after you show up in the United States whether or not you are in the U.S. legitimately or unlawfully. Since its establishing, the United States has been an asylum for exiles looking for assurance from mistreatment. The nation has conceded haven to in excess of 2 million evacuees over the most recent three decades alone. Who is a Refugee? U.S. law characterizes a displaced person as somebody who: Is situated outside the United States.Is of extraordinary philanthropic worry to the United States.Demonstrates that they â€Å"were aggrieved or dread mistreatment because of race, religion, nationality, political feeling, or enrollment in a specific social group.†Is not solidly resettled in another country.Is permissible to the United States. An exile does exclude any individual who â€Å"ordered, actuated, helped, or in any case took an interest in the mistreatment of any individual because of race, religion, nationality, enrollment in a specific social gathering, or political opinion.† Alleged financial displaced people, those the U.S. government considers to escape destitution in their countries, are not allowable. For instance, a large number of Haitian vagrants who appeared on Florida shores have fallen into this class in late decades, and the legislature has returned them to their country. How Might Someone Obtain Asylum? There are two courses through the lawful framework for acquiring refuge in the United States: the positive procedure and the cautious procedure. For shelter through the positive procedure, the displaced person must be truly present in the United States. It doesn't make a difference how the outcast showed up. Displaced people commonly should apply to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services inside on year of the date of their last appearance in the United States, except if they can show uncontrollable issues at hand that postponed documenting. Candidates must record Form I-589, the Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal, to USCIS. In the event that the administration dismisses the application and the displaced person doesn't have legitimate migration status, at that point USCIS will give a Form I-862, Notice to Appear, and allude the case to a movement judge for goals. As indicated by USCIS, confirmed haven candidates are infrequently confined. Candidates may live in the United States while the administration is preparing their applications. Candidates can likewise stay in the nation while trusting that an appointed authority will hear their case yet are only sometimes permitted to work here lawfully. Guarded Application for Asylum A cautious application for haven is the point at which an exile demands refuge as insurance against expulsion from the United States. Just exiles that are in expulsion procedures in a migration court can apply for guarded shelter. There by and large are two different ways evacuees end up in the protective haven process under the Executive Office for Immigration Review: USCIS has alluded them to a movement judge after the legislature has managed them ineligible for refuge in the wake of experiencing the agreed process.They were put in evacuation procedures since they were secured in the United States without legitimate authoritative records or disregarding their migration status. Or on the other hand, they were discovered attempting to enter the United States without legitimate archives and assigned for facilitated expulsion. It’s critical to take note of that guarded shelter hearings are court-like. They are directed by movement judges and are antagonistic. The appointed authority will hear contentions from the legislature and from the candidate before making a decision. The movement judge has the ability to give the exile a green card or choose whether the evacuee might be qualified for different types of alleviation. Either side can offer the judge’s choice. In the certifiable procedure, the evacuee shows up before a USCIS haven official for a non-ill-disposed meeting. The individual must give a certified translator to that meet. In the guarded procedure, the migration court gives the mediator. Finding a certified legal counselor is significant for exiles attempting to explore the refuge procedure which can be long and confused.

Business Law Research Paper Example

Business Law Paper Business law In business law, for an agreement to be enforceable it must be provable. This implies whether it is composed or oral, an agreement must have some type of approach to demonstrate that it is existent (Jennings, 2006). For oral agreements, it might be hard to demonstrate presence of specific terms because of absence of proof. Be that as it may, composed agreements are simpler to demonstrate as it is composed on paper and marked by the two gatherings included, subsequently can be alluded to when there is the event of a penetrate of agreement provoking case. In this example, if a gathering relinquishes his obligation as communicated in the particulars of the agreement, it will be conceivable to demonstrate the presence of those legally binding conditions in the terms expressed. The idea of confirmation of agreement distinguishes the significance of the capacity to demonstrate the legitimacy of the agreement as this is the thing that will render it enforceable in the official courtroom. Th is idea is subject to the idea of the wording of the agreement and the ideas of the agreement comparable to the idea of the agreement being referred to. We will compose a custom exposition test on Business Law explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom paper test on Business Law explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom paper test on Business Law explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer This agreement is legitimate as it meets all the authoritative terms of sincere trust, a gathering of psyches, execution desire on the two gatherings, shared thought and there was an offer and acknowledgment where the purchaser acknowledged these terms before going into the agreement. Along these lines, the purchaser was under commitment to act as per the set terms as he had acknowledged them before marking it. Seinfields couldn't guarantee of not paying the charge on the grounds that Cohen had gotten a measure of expense from Mayeris as this was not an option expressed in the agreement and the activity among Mayeris and Cohen don't influence the composed agreement as they are outside its degree. Notwithstanding, Cohen likewise breaks the agreement in that there is no absolute presentation on her part where her obligations incorporate and are not constrained to demonstrating the house to the customers when required. For this situation, she was missing when the respondent required see ing the house indicating fractional execution on her part. With this proof, the court ought not organization Seinfields to pay Cohen, as there was non-execution where she neglected to play out her obligation as the agent. There likewise is absence of significant proof of harms by the offended party due to the non-installment that happened.

The Ethics of Remote Assassination by Autonomous Military Drones - Free Essay Example

In recent years, there have been impressive technological advancements of military drones; however, as the number of and usage of drones increases, and the levels of autonomy elevate, so too do public concerns regarding the ethics and morality of unmanned drone strikes. Many of the most commonly articulated ethical concerns stem from confusion and uncertainty regarding the word autonomy itself. Defined simply: autonomy is the ability for a machine to perform a task by itself. Obviously, some machines are more autonomous than others, and many machines only rely on human control for specific tasks. For example, when the trigger of a machine gun trigger is pulled, the rapid firing that results is an automated process, but when the magazine is empty, a human must take control and reload the weapon. Thus, while a machine gun requires a high level of human control to function, it is still considered an autonomous weapon. With this in mind, and especially when considering the use of powerful military weapons such as drones, it is clear why it is essential to define the specific tasks that are being automated, rather than just labeling the entire device as autonomous. Currently, there are no fully autonomous military drones that is, drones that perform all of their tasks and choices without human control   but the level of drone autonomy is rapidly increasing. Many current critics fear that drones are capable of, or will be soon, instantaneously computing moral judgements and deciding which targets to kill by themselves; however, as of now, that level of autonomy still exists only as science fiction.   For example, many believe that soldiers must be at serious personal risk in order to possess the moral authority to kill in battle. Other critics highlight a genuine concern that civilian casualties occur, making the use of these weapons immoral for that reason. There is a concern that the detachment associated with a lack of home team casualties will make the military leadership too comfortable using this weaponry with little public complaint. There are other critics that understand the current status of drones, yet still believe the use of them to be unethical for various reasons. Closer examination reveals however that these concerns are misplaced.   In fact, by several important measures, highly autonomous drones provide not only military and strategic advantages, but are also tools that allow for the waging of war at higher standards of ethics and morality than is possible without them.  Ã‚   Autonomous drones have been proven to greatly assist in reducing the number of civilian deaths in armed conflict. The key to safe, efficient, and ethical use of autonomous drones will be the careful and deliberate set of instructions that military engineers and high ranking military officials provide them. By programming high levels of autonomy in advance, drones will be able to operate efficiently and without emotional interference, while still adhering to human set guidelines. Historically, nations have achieved military dominance through various means: superior tactics and strategies; better access to resources; highly-skilled combatants. Technological innovations, too, have provided an important military advantage: from the Roman Ballista, to the English longbow, all the way to the modern assault rifle. New weapons have often brought with them contemporary ethical concerns. Most notably, atomic weaponry especially as man developed horrific weapons within the last century that have not been used in over sixty years because of their capacity to kill huge numbers of civilians. In the case of drones, they too are just a weapon. Just like it is not unethical to use an assault rifle in combat, it is not unethical to use drones; however, it is unethical to abuse the power of drones and violate the Laws of Armed Conflict. While atomic bombs are clearly weapons too, their use is blatantly unethical because of the unavoidable, catastrophically large number casualt ies that will result from their utilization. Some critics are concerned about the moral implications of using weapons that put civilians   but not the weapons operators   at risk. According to the just-war principles, it is better to risk the lives of ones own combatants than the lives of enemy noncombatants, The Christian Century magazine opined. But this moral calculus is completely tossed aside in the case of drone warfare, since drone operators dont risk their lives at all.   With drone operators doing their work in the safety of an office environment close to their homes and families, they are delivering lethal force from behind computer screens to battlefields thousands of miles away.   While it can be seen that this seems somehow unfair, it is not morally wrong.   Aleksandar Fatic argues that the failure to endure hardship or take risks disqualifies the drone operator from the historic military tradition that gives soldiers the moral authority to kill.  Ã‚   The soldier who is literally getting his hands dirt y laying anti-personnel mines that subsequently kill children and farmers is not acting in a morally superior fashion whatsoever.   Nor is the pilot who perhaps has some remote risk of being shot down while he drops thousands of pounds of explosives on cities 20,000 feet below, as occurred with alarming civilian casualties during the second world war firebombing of Dresden or Tokyo, a sympathetic claimant to the moral high ground.   The Syrian pilot dropping his payload of chemical weapons on civilians is rightly viewed as committing a war crime.   More to the point, it is the commander of the forces that sends this pilot on this mission that is viewed as the war criminal. With documented evidence of civilian casualties resulting from drone strikes, concerns have been voiced that these are therefore immoral weapons.   By this measure, there are no moral lethal weapons.  Ã‚   Perhaps that is true, but within the context of military conflict, it is the relative propensity to inflict civilian casualties and death that is relevant.   David Rohde, a New York Times reporter held captive by the Taliban for seven months before escaping in June 2009: I saw firsthand in North and South Waziristan [in the Pakistani tribal region] that the drone strikes do have a major impact. They generally are accurate. The strikes that went on killed foreign militants or Afghan or Pakistani Taliban around us. There were some civilians killed, but generally the Taliban would greatly exaggerate the number of civilians killed. They inhibited their operations. Taliban leaders were very nervous about being tracked by drones. So they are effective. . . . They do eliminate some top leaders As compared to other lethal weapons, the rate of civilian casualties from drone attacks is low. The New America Foundation stated in mid-2011 that from 2004 to 2011, 80% of the 2,551 people killed in the strikes were militants. The Foundation stated that 95% of those killed in 2010 were militants and that, as of 2012, 15% of the total people killed by drone strikes were either known civilians or unknown  Ã‚  Ã‚   During the entire Vietnam war, it is estimated that while 444,000 North Vietnamese soldiers were killed, over 625,000 civilians perished in that conflict.   Civilian casualties during the wars in Iraq outnumbered combatants by a wide margin as well.   The organization Iraq Body Count estimates total casualties including combatants at 280,000, of which between 182,000 and 204,000 are civilians, suggesting that two thirds of all deaths were civilian.   If the high end of estimates are accurate, drone attacks have been responsible for 1 civilian death for every 4 combat ants.   Perhaps the most compelling of the arguments that drones are morally problematic weapons is the concern that they make the death and destruction too remote from the public eye, thereby desensitizing the average citizen from the horrors of war.   Argues Mary L. Dudziak, a professor of law, history and political science at the University of Southern California: Drones are a technological step that further isolates the American people from military action, undermining political checks on contemporary warfare, And the isolation of the people, historians of war have argued, helps enable ongoing, endless war. This is a public policy argument larger than the issue of drones.  Ã‚   Governments have hidden the actions of their military and the resultant death and misery long before drones were invented.   Many years into the military involvement of US soldiers in Vietnam, the truth was kept from the American public, and deliberate management of public perceptions through misinformation and deception remains a reasonable concern.   A new weapon is not inherently morally objectionable if it is associated with this deception.   The political and military leadership that deliberately deceives the public however is.  Ã‚  Ã‚   With the recorded footage created by each drone strike, much like the dashboard cameras and body cameras that civilian police forces are beginning to adopt, accountability is arguable increased with this technology. Legal frameworks form a useful perspective with which to explore the ethical implications of autonomous drones.  Ã‚   Existing legal standards understand that in the fog of war, humans will do terrible things and mistakes will be made.   The human emotions of fear and anger will naturally play important roles in the conduct of soldiers.  Ã‚   So too will human limitations adversely impact the ability collect, absorb and process information quickly and accurately in the heat of battle.  Ã‚   When judging the actions of military personnel during wartime,   some allowances are necessarily and reasonably made for this unfortunate reality.   It is the effort to minimize civilian deaths now referred to euphemistically as collateral damage that forms the basis of much of the evolving legal and moral framework within which we view the waging of war.   An examination of these new autonomous drones within this framework is important, as their capacity to remove the human element that is the basis of the wiggle room with which we make allowances for the unfortunate inevitable loss of non-combatant lives makes them a morally superior weapon because of the fact that we can hold them to a higher standard than weapons more burdened with human frailties.

Love and Chance in Marivaux - Literature Essay Samples

Marivaux’s play The Game of Love and Chance is a short work composed in the Italian style of commedia dell’arte, using stock characters and humor to explore conventional themes. Specifically, The Game of Love and Chance is tailored to address the relationships between love, fortune, and factors such as reason and social class. Marivaux utilizes the social statuses and behaviors of the characters to suggest that love and chance, as seen through the prism of social class, are both powerful causal forces that overpower reason. It becomes evident early on in the play that love and fortune are both potent causal forces. The effects of these combined forces are most clearly seen in the psychological states of the characters under their influence. For instance, the emotional stability of the upper-class young woman, Silvia, is referred to both indirectly and as a form of self-commentary. Silvia has fallen in love against her will with Dorante, a nobleman disguised as a simple valet. Other characters are first to notice the changes that take place in Silvia. The servant Lisette states that Silvia â€Å"grow[s] passionate† at the mere mention of Dorante, and says that she â€Å"[does] not understand [Silvia’s] vicious mood† because she has â€Å"never seen [Silvia] in such a state† (339). Silvia’s brother, Mario, states that Silvia appears â€Å"strange,† â€Å"touchy,† and in â€Å"quite a frenzy,† and her father, Orgon, agrees that Silvia is â€Å"so distraught [he does] not recognize [her]† (345-346). Silvia eventually likewise criticizes herself in a brief soliloquy, proclaiming: â€Å"How wretched I feel! I am more than distressed. I feel burdened and disturbed† (347). In the context of the play, Silvia’s transformations, which take place after chance has suddenly inspired her to fall in love with an unexpected character, imply that the forces of chance and love are capable o f causing extensive psychological modification. The verification of these changes by both the character being described and all of the characters assumed to be most familiar with her strengthen the argument that the forces are quite powerful indeed. It is also implied that the causal forces of love and chance are assumed to be so powerful because they are the laws of nature. For example, Silvia’s future relationship with Dorante is discussed in the opening of the play, before the couple has even met. Lisette states that for Silvia to reject or have contempt for the arranged marriage â€Å"is unnatural† (317). Although the couple has not yet met, in a sense this statement foreshadows how natural and easy it will be for Silvia to eventually embrace the changes that love causes. Similarly, fortune is implicated as a natural law. When Lisette and Arlequin, both lower-class servants, fall in love while disguised as upper-class individuals, Lisette comments on Arlequin by s tating that â€Å"So much humility is not natural† (358). Since humility is a trait associated with lower-class members of society, and Arlequin at the time is thought to be an upper-class person, it is clear that social roles are thought of as naturally components of each class. Because fortune defines social class, it is implied that chance is a natural force acting upon individuals. In the play, both love and chance are portrayed as being more powerful than human reason. Characters continuously attempt to utilize reason to manage their personal lives, yet it appears that when one is under the influence of the deterministic forces of love and chance, reason is overpowered. Silvia, for instance, often reflects upon herself in a manner that indicates that she is engaged in an internal battle between the love that fortune has brought her to and her powers of reasoning. In all cases, Silvia seems to find herself acting in opposition to reason. For example, in one particular co nversation with Dorante, Silvia exclaims: â€Å"Whether you go, whether you stay, whether you come back, all these movements must not affect me nor do they, in factThese are my resolutions! My reason allows me no others and I should not even let myself tell you about them† (341). However, despite her resolve, Silvia finds herself charmed by Dorante, and admittedly finds herself â€Å"rush[ing] into frenzies† whenever she is around him (340). Later, after Dorante reveals his identity and Silvia is still disguised as a maid, Silvia recognizes that similar forces are present within Dorante, stating: â€Å"He thinks that if he marries me he will betray his birth and his wealthThese are not light obstacles†¦ I can almost feel the conflict in him. I want a battle between Love and Reason† (356). Mario responds by accurately predicting the victor of this battle, exclaiming: â€Å"And death to Reason, I suppose!† (356). When Dorante proceeds to ask the disg uised Silvia for her love despite their apparent differences in social class and the rules of convention, it becomes clear that love indeed overcomes what reason may dictate for an individual. In fact, it is often the case that surrendering one’s reason and embracing the love that fortune has brought typically produces positive results. For instance, when Mario realizes that both Silvia and Dorante have decided to meet in disguise, he tells Orgon: â€Å"Well, Sir, since matters have taken this course I should leave them be† (323). By the end of the play, it is clear that this decision allows Dorante and Silvia to interact, forming the basis of their relationship. Yielding one’s reason to the forces of love and chance allows one to align him/herself with what these forces have decreed. For example, after both Silvia and Dorante have revealed their true identities, Silvia tells Dorante, â€Å"we both used the same masquerade to become better acquainted. That sai d, there is no more to say. You love me and I will never be able to doubt it† (365). It is clear that Silvia has finally discontinued her attempts to reason about Dorante, and acknowledged that the existence of his love is all that should be taken into consideration. Therefore, it is implied that happiness is often reached when one lets go of his/her reason and lines him/herself up with what natural forces have caused. The relationship between Arlequin and Lisette often humorously encourages this approach. When Lisette questions Arlequin about whether he should be reasonable rather about their relationship, Arlequin declares: â€Å"Reasonable? Oh, alas, I have lost my reason. Your lovely eyes are the rascals that took it away† (335). Thus, it again appears that reason is overtaken by the natural force of love. For Marivaux, this idea may have served as a commentary on the Enlightenment rationalism that was popular around the time that the play was first produced. Altho ugh love and chance have many similar characteristics, there is an interesting relationship between the two individual forces: they are related by social structure. Chance decides what social class a particular person belongs to, since people born into a certain class become another member of it. This is referred to quite often by many of the characters in the play. For instance, when Lisette reminds Arlequin that they â€Å"are not the masters of [their own] fate,† Arlequin agrees by stating: â€Å"That lies in the hands of our mothers and fathers† (337). Since the social status of the parents was similarly due to the fortune of their own parents, it is implied that all social roles are formulated by chance. More indirectly, social status is related to fortune because the fortune of certain lower-class individuals appears to be decreed in part by the upper-class members whom they work for. In reference to what should become of Arlequin, Orgon says: â€Å"His master w ill decide his fate† (347). Therefore, chance defines one’s social status. Social status, in turn, influences how a particular individual speaks and behaves. Each class has an expected and unique version of language and acceptable interactions, so examining these traits in a certain individual can often reveal his/her social status. For example, Silvia states that even when she is disguised as a lower-class maid, â€Å"there will be something in [her] manner that demands respect† (324). Dorante clearly recognizes that Silvia’s language and behavior do not match her lower-class status. Quickly upon meeting, Dorante states that even though he normally has â€Å"no great liking for [chambermaids’] company or attitudes,† he feels differently around Silvia, having â€Å"a constant desire to take off [his] hat† and â€Å"to treat [her] with such respect† (Marivaux 326.) This is a reflection on both Silvia and Dorante, since neither o f their behaviors match their lower-class disguises. Silvia notices a similar disjunction between the mannerisms of Dorante and Arlequin with relation to their positions, and she states: â€Å"How strange fate is. Neither of those two men is in his proper place† (Marivaux 330.) This statement also helps elucidate the relationship between fortune and behavior: chance identifies an individual’s social status, and social status defines how an individual speaks and acts. Finally, a person’s language and behavior typically fosters specific relationships, somewhat regardless of what social class people may be in. The playful bantering between Lisette and Arlequin, juxtaposed to the more serious and more eloquent flirtation between Silvia and Dorante, is a good example of how interactions among members of the same class reflect their common mannerisms. Also, the characters often remark about each others behavior relative to their social class when discussing their lov e. For instance, after Arlequin and Lisette uncover their true identities, Arlequin tells Lisette: â€Å"You may have changed names but you have not changed your face and you know quite well that we promised to love each other in spite of all spelling mistakes† (Marivaux 360.) Thus, it is implied that the couple loves each other because of each person’s behavior and language, regardless of what social class they are apparently assigned to. Dorante makes a similar claim near the end of the play, telling Silvia: â€Å"There is no degree, no birth, no fortune that does not wither away before your love† (Marivaux 364.) In some ways, there appears to be a motif of love transcending social class. However, since relationships are based upon mannerisms that are defined by social status, indirectly social class is still responsible for arrangement of the personal affairs. Furthermore, at times it appears that love is a somewhat more powerful force than chance. For examp le, early in the play Silvia tells Dorante: â€Å"Fortune has used you ill,† since at the time he had the meager position of a valet, and Dorante responds: â€Å"Love has used me worse. I would rather be able to ask you for your love than to have all the riches on earth† (Marivaux 328.) Again, it appears that love transcends social statuses, although the love most likely would not have formed if Dorante hadn’t already learned to interact with people of a similar manner. However, Marivaux may be implying that under the right circumstances, love can be a more powerful influence upon an individual than chance. In either case, it is clear that love is related to chance through social structure. Chance defines an individual’s mannerisms based on their social class, and in turn those mannerisms align similar individuals and foster love. Thus, in Marivaux’s The Game of Love and Chance, love and chance serve as deterministic natural forces. Both forces ar e powerful and capable of causing major changes within an individual, and both overpower reason. The two forces are related to each other through social structure.